Bennett v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Such an impediment ‘should require a mental derangement precluding a person from comprehending rights which he would otherwise be bound to understand.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Myers v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2001-10-31· cited 27×
• Bond v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1999-03-19· cited 10×
• Dean v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2010-03-29· cited 9×
• Hyde v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2008-12-24· cited 5×
• Shinogee Ex Rel. Duffy v. Fanning
  District of Columbia· 2017-01-13· cited 2×
• Chaney v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-02-02· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Goewey v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1979-12-12· cited 85×
• Michael G. Hurick v. The Honorable John Lehman, Secretary of the U.S. Navy
  Federal Circuit· 1986-01-23· cited 84×
• Coon v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1994-03-11· cited 20×
• D'Andrea v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1993-02-05· cited 11×
• Pottawatomi Nation in Canada v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1992-12-14· cited 7×