Bennett v. Stuart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it is difficult to understand the argument that a corporation with 100% ownership of its subsidiary does not have the right to control that subsidiary”
• viewing the fact that prior plaintiffs raised the “same seven claims and [sought] essentially the same relief’ as indicating that the interests of the prior and current plaintiffs were aligned
• “[I]t is not the role of this Court to wade into the merits or motives-of FHFA and Treasury’s actions— rather the Court is limited to reviewing those actions on their face and determining if .they were permissible under the authority granted by the [Recovery Act].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).