Skip to main content

Bennett v. State

Citations

  • 65 Fla. 84
  • 61 So. 127

Syllabus

<p>1. An indictment for perjury is sufficient which is not so vague, indistinct or indefinite as to mislead the accused or embarrass him in the preparation of his defense or expose him to substantial damger of a new prosecution for the same offense.</p> <p>2: There is no error in refusing special instructions upon matters covered by the general charge of the trial judge.</p>

Judges: Cockrell, Hooker, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.