Bennett v. State
Citations
- 65 Fla. 84
- 61 So. 127
Syllabus
<p>1. An indictment for perjury is sufficient which is not so vague, indistinct or indefinite as to mislead the accused or embarrass him in the preparation of his defense or expose him to substantial damger of a new prosecution for the same offense.</p> <p>2: There is no error in refusing special instructions upon matters covered by the general charge of the trial judge.</p>
Judges: Cockrell, Hooker, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Patterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-09-17· cited 26×
- Settles v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-02-21· cited 24×
- Burnett v. SouleSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-11-29· cited 16×
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-02-23· cited 15×
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-02-26· cited 7×
- Jarvis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1917-03-13· cited 6×
- Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1921-06-23· cited 5×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1876-01-15· cited 21×
- Fudge v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-01-15· cited 16×
- State ex rel. City of New Orleans v. EllisSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1904-08-19· cited 14×
- Griffin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-06-15· cited 10×
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1882-01-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.