District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/6/2013
Bennett v. State
Citations
- 111 So. 3d 983
- 2013 WL 1859021
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7284
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- K-9’s “sniff was up to snuff,” and thus trial court did not err in denying motion to suppress based on its determination that police had probable cause to search a vehicle’s trunk
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rowe, Thomas, Wetherell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court· 2003-12-15· cited 1,610×
- Florida v. HarrisSupreme Court· 2013-02-19· cited 782×
- Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-09-22· cited 31×
- Blalock v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-19· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.