Bennett v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that probation condition required probationer to “enter into and successfully complete” a sex offender treatment program, but finding that “no condition of probation was imposed that required him to admit to a counselor the sexual acts charged”
• holding that defendant’s refusal to admit to charged offense leading to his dismissal from treatment program was not willful violation of probation because defendant had not been advised that he would have to admit to offense in order to complete probation
• court concluded that there was no probation violation where appellant, who had pled guilty to charge of sexual conduct with a child and was ordered to complete a sex offender treatment, had not been told he would have to admit guilt for underlying offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mills v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-26· cited 18×
• Stevens v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-16· cited 13×
• Warren Staples v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-10-06· cited 10×
• Glasier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-16· cited 6×
• Lawson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-23· cited 6×
• Staples v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-10-24· cited 6×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-14

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Molina v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-02-26· cited 19×
• Bell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-11· cited 17×
• Diaz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-15· cited 11×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-02· cited 11×