Bennett v. R & L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a defendant’s motion for entry of judgment as a matter of law where the defendant had caused the plaintiff to be erroneously arrested for a crime by providing incomplete information when he reported the crime to the police
• also noting that someone who passively responds police requests for information cannot be held liable for malicious prosecution
• “The lost future earnings damages awarded, though certainly not established to a mathematical certainty, were proven to a reasonable certainty and were grounded upon facts specific to Bennett.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).