Bennett v. Progressive Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there were still genuine issues of material fact as to whether the harassment “culminated” in the employee’s termination
• denying summary judgment when “sufficient factual disputes have been raised as to whether or not the termination, in the end, was a culmination, or result, of [a supervisor’s] harassment”
• “Plaintiff must first prove all of the elements of the substantive discrimination claims, in this case, either retaliation or sexual harassment, and that the individual defendants actually participated in the discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).