· 1/29/1962
Bennett v. Markley
Citations
- 138 So. 2d 169
- 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1627
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, “once law enforcement officers have secured a cell[ular] telephone, there is no longer any risk that the arrestee [] will be able to delete incriminating data from the phone”
- “In light of the [Supreme] Court’s decision in Riley, the [warrantless] search of Stem’s cellular telephone undoubtedly was unconstitutional.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landry, Lottinger, Reid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.