Skip to main content
· 1/29/1962

Bennett v. Markley

Citations

  • 138 So. 2d 169
  • 1962 La. App. LEXIS 1627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, “once law enforcement officers have secured a cell[ular] telephone, there is no longer any risk that the arrestee [] will be able to delete incriminating data from the phone”
  • “In light of the [Supreme] Court’s decision in Riley, the [warrantless] search of Stem’s cellular telephone undoubtedly was unconstitutional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landry, Lottinger, Reid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.