Skip to main content
· 9/16/2010

Bennett v. James

Citations

  • 737 F. Supp. 2d 219
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96959
  • 2010 WL 3583410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a plaintiff’s “perception” that filing a grievance would be “futile” is not sufficient to render the administrative remedies “unavailable”
  • finding plaintiff failed to exhaust where “[h]e provides no information as to who . . . misinformed him – or where and when these alleged interactions took place.”
  • describing grievance procedures in Westchester County Department of Corrections Inmate Rules and Regulations Handbook
  • granting summary judgment on exhaustion grounds when plaintiff provided only “conclusory allegations”
  • nonmoving pro se litigant “must produce specific facts to rebut the movant’s showing and to establish that there are material issues of fact requiring a trial” (internal quotations omitted); Lee v. Coughlin, 902 F. Supp. 424, 429 (S.D.N.Y. 1995

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gabriel W. Gorenstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.