· 9/16/2010
Bennett v. James
Citations
- 737 F. Supp. 2d 219
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96959
- 2010 WL 3583410
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that a plaintiff’s “perception” that filing a grievance would be “futile” is not sufficient to render the administrative remedies “unavailable”
- finding plaintiff failed to exhaust where “[h]e provides no information as to who . . . misinformed him – or where and when these alleged interactions took place.”
- describing grievance procedures in Westchester County Department of Corrections Inmate Rules and Regulations Handbook
- granting summary judgment on exhaustion grounds when plaintiff provided only “conclusory allegations”
- nonmoving pro se litigant “must produce specific facts to rebut the movant’s showing and to establish that there are material issues of fact requiring a trial” (internal quotations omitted); Lee v. Coughlin, 902 F. Supp. 424, 429 (S.D.N.Y. 1995
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gabriel W. Gorenstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.