Bennett v. Industrial Com'n of Utah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a subcontractor’s employee was an employee of the general contractor for purposes of workers’ compensation
• explaining that this provision makes principal contractor liable for securing workers' compensation coverage for person hired by subcontractor
• explaining that this provision makes principal contractor liable for securing workers’ compensation coverage for person hired by subcontractor
• noting that \the term 'supervision or control' [under the statutory standard] requires only that the general contractor retain ultimate control over the project\
• the Commission has no expertise or experience in determining whether a worker is an “employee” within the meaning of the workers’ compensation laws
• \The trade or business of a general contractor in the construction business is construction....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).