Skip to main content
· 5/27/1895

Bennett v. Harkrader

Citations

  • 158 U.S. 441
  • 15 S. Ct. 863
  • 39 L. Ed. 1046
  • 1895 U.S. LEXIS 2270
  • 1 Alaska Fed. 400

Syllabus

<p>The location certificate in this case, though defective in form, was properly introduced for the purpose of showing the time when the possession was taken, and to point out, as far as it might, the property which was taken possession of.</p> <p>The instructions complained of properly presented to the jury the two ultimate questions to be decided by it.</p> <p>In Oregon a general verdict for the plaintiff, where the complaint alleges that the plaintiff is entitled to the possession of certain described property which is unlawfully detained by the defendant, and the possession of which the plaintiff prays to recover, is sufficient.</p>

Judges: Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.