Bennett v. City of Redfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring to Supreme Court precedent to determine employees of city governments do not comprise a suspect class
• denying motion to amend filed sixteen months after suit was commenced, twenty days before trial date, and after deadlines set by the court
• deferring to Supreme Court precedent to determine employees of city governments do not comprise a suspect class
• affirming district court’s denial of motion to amend because it substantially changed the issues at trial and was untimely
• finding no liberty- or property-interest due process violation where claimant was advised of removal in accordance with section 372.15, a timely public hearing was held upon the claimant's request, and the claimant appeared at the hearing with counsel and disputed removal
• non-civil service city employee given public hearing pursuant to section 372.15 to contest the reasons for his discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).