Skip to main content
· 4/7/1896

Bennett v. Chicago, Mil. & St. P. Ry. Co.

Citations

  • 8 S.D. 394
  • 66 N.W. 934
  • 1896 S.D. LEXIS 49

Syllabus

<p>1. Where, in an action to recover for stock killed by a railway train, the testimony as to the circumstances of the killing, on which the question of defendant’s negligence depended, was conflicting, the verdict of the jury will not be disturbed.</p> <p>2. A judgment will not be reversed because of the erroneous admission of evidence, where it is not prejudicial to appellant.</p>

Judges: Haney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.