· 4/7/1896
Bennett v. Chicago, Mil. & St. P. Ry. Co.
Citations
- 8 S.D. 394
- 66 N.W. 934
- 1896 S.D. LEXIS 49
Syllabus
<p>1. Where, in an action to recover for stock killed by a railway train, the testimony as to the circumstances of the killing, on which the question of defendant’s negligence depended, was conflicting, the verdict of the jury will not be disturbed.</p> <p>2. A judgment will not be reversed because of the erroneous admission of evidence, where it is not prejudicial to appellant.</p>
Judges: Haney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.