Skip to main content

Bennett v. Bennett

Citations

  • 496 N.W.2d 353
  • 197 Mich. App. 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where a litigant believes that this Court erred, the appropriate remedy is to seek either rehearing in this Court or leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, not to return to the trial court and argue that the Court of Appeals decision was erroneous and, therefore, should not be followed.”
  • “Where a litigant believes that this Court erred, the appropriate remedy is to seek either rehearing in this Court or leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, not to return to the trial court and argue that the Court of Appeals decision was erroneous and, therefore, should not be followed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hood, Sawyer, Jansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.