Bennett v. Bennett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• presuming that the trial court understood the law and intended to enter a valid judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rhodes v. Rhodes
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1962-04-24· cited 45×
• Mattox v. Cassady
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-05-27· cited 27×
• Hess v. Seeger
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-03-23· cited 26×
• Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 22×
• Schnitzer Investment Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-06-30· cited 13×
• In re the Marriage of Neal
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-08· cited 13×
• In re the Marriage of Cross
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-12-30· cited 10×
• Bishins v. Mateer
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2004-06-30· cited 8×
• Interstate Roofing, Inc. v. Springville Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-25· cited 7×
• In Re Gardner
  D. Oregon· 1965-06-30· cited 6×
• Delavega v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-03· cited 5×
• In re the Marriage of Howard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-09-12· cited 5×
• Moreland v. Moreland
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1962-09-26· cited 3×
• Schwab v. Schwab
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-07-22· cited 3×
• Johnson v. Sporalsky
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-12-14· cited 2×
• In re the Marriage of Fletcher
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-03-20· cited 2×
• Rodrigues and Gerhards
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-29· cited 2×
• Taylor v. Hill
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-12· cited 1×
• Parker v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-01-14