· 7/11/1966
Bennett, Etc. v. Pearson, Etc.
Citations
- 218 N.E.2d 168
- 139 Ind. App. 224
- 1966 Ind. App. LEXIS 458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- application of prima facie error rule is not for appellant's benefit and is discretionary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.