Skip to main content
· 5/2/2007

Benn v. County of Los Angeles

Citations

  • 58 Cal. Rptr. 3d 563
  • 150 Cal. App. 4th 478
  • 2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4869
  • 2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the “mere inclusion of the ‘termination for convenience’ clause in the contracts eliminated the essential characteristic of permanence and entitlement necessary to a finding of a protectable property right”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.