Skip to main content
· 8/8/2011

Benjamin v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation

Citations

  • 837 F. Supp. 2d 840
  • 2011 WL 3471064
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘New York courts routinely refer to the Second Restatement as authority for conflict-of-laws principles governing contracts.”
  • “New York law provides that, ‘[a]s a general matter, the parties’ manifested intentions to have an agreement governed by the law of a particular jurisdiction are honored.’” (quoting Freedman v. Chem. Constr. Corp., 43 N.Y.2d 260, 401 N.Y.S.2d 176, 372 N.E.2d 12, 15 (1977))
  • “Where the contract is an insurance policy providing that the insurer will make payment within a certain time after the insured submits a proof of loss, the date when payment is due is an ‘ascertainable date’ for the existence of a cause of action.”
  • applying this rule in the insurance context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bucklo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.