Skip to main content
· 6/19/1995

Benjamin v. Aroostook Medical Center, Inc.

Citations

  • 57 F.3d 101
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 514
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15039
  • 66 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,616
  • 1995 WL 355292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Standing is the determination of whether a specific person is the proper party to bring a particular matter to the court for adjudication” and “may review [such] sua sponte.”
  • guoting Richman v. General Motors Corp., 437 F.2d 196, 199 (1st Cir. 1971)
  • “The burden of alleging facts necessary to establish standing falls upon the party seeking to invoke the jurisdiction of the court.”
  • “Here, the injured party is clearly identified and has sufficient interest in the litigation ... to pursue (and, in fact, has pursued) the action.”
  • “Here, the injured party is clearly identified and has sufficient interest in the litigation . . . to pursue (and, in fact, has pursued) the action.”
  • in deciding motion for extension of time, district court’s failure to allow for factors beyond party’s control, such as counsel’s unexpected illness, may, in certain cases, constitute abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Bownes, Stahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.