Skip to main content
· 2/28/2024

Benjamin Taylor v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that even when the underlying case was deemed a \close\ call, courts have found no substantial justification and awarded attorney's fees.
  • in measuring substantial justification, \one must compare the [government's conduct] with the Act it was supposed to implement\
  • in measuring substantial justification, “one must compare the [government’s conduct] with the Act it was supposed to implement”
  • fees and expenses, including those “related to litigation over fees,” must have been “reasonably incurred”
  • “The district court could have—and should have—equitably reduced the overall award to reflect the plaintiffs’ less than complete success . . . .”
  • fees and expenses, including those “related to litigation over fees,” must have been “reasonably incurred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.