Benjamin Sherman v. State of Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence in the criminal context, we view the evidence “and all reasonable inferences derived therefrom” in the light most favorable to the verdict winner
• the factfinder resolves “contradictory testimony and questions of credibility,” and “[w]e cannot substitute our judgment for that of the factfinder”
• “The weight of the evidence is exclusively for the finder of fact, who is free to believe all, none[,] or some of the evidence and to determine the credibility of the witnesses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).