Benjamin Perlman v. City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, William Devoney and Robert Trusz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Franks’s requirement of a “substantial preliminary showing” that the officer deliber‐ ately misrepresented facts in a warrant affidavit applies in civil as well as criminal actions
• holding that Franks’s requirement of a “substantial preliminary showing” that the officer deliber‐ ately misrepresented facts in a warrant affidavit applies in civil as well as criminal actions
• holding that Franks’s requirement of a “substantial preliminary showing” that the officer deliber‐ ately misrepresented facts in a warrant affidavit applies in civil as well as criminal actions
• asserting that there is “no rea‐ son to apply a standard different than that established by Franks to a civil action for damages based on an allegation that No. 17‐2521 19 a police officer deliberately misrepresented facts in a warrant affidavit”
• asserting that there is “no rea‐ son to apply a standard different than that established by Franks to a civil action for damages based on an allegation that No. 17‐2521 19 a police officer deliberately misrepresented facts in a warrant affidavit”
• asserting that there is “no rea‐ son to apply a standard different than that established by Franks to a civil action for damages based on an allegation that No. 17‐2521 19 a police officer deliberately misrepresented facts in a warrant affidavit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).