Skip to main content
· 7/3/2014

Benjamin Orozco v. Pane E. Vino, Incorporated

Citations

  • 757 F.3d 445
  • 22 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1653
  • 2014 WL 3037943
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12680

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the first element of the economic-realities test requires the plaintiff to “present evidence that [the defendant] possessed the power to hire and fire him”
  • “[t]he remedial purposes of the FLSA require the courts to define ‘employer’ more broadly than the term would be interpreted in traditional common law applications.”
  • “We rely on the economic reality test when determining a party's status as an employer under the FLSA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Higginbotham, Elrod

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.