BENJAMIN LICONA v. JAY RIEMENSCHNEIDER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[although ‘including’ has been found to be ambiguous by itself, other language [in the statute] may remove the ambiguity, as in this case”
• interpreting § 14-227a [c], now [b]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).