Benitez v. Girlfriday, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the appellant's isolated use of offensive language during a private argument with her supervisor was not misconduct connected with work
• holding that an isolated incident in which an employee used profanity in a telephone conversation with her supervisor did not constitute misconduct sufficient to cut off unemployment benefits
• finding that claimant who directed vulgar and profane epithets to her manager during an argument with him conducted over the telephone did not commit misconduct
• reversing denial of benefits based on misconduct when claimant engaged in telephone argument with branch manager during which she used profanity when referring to manager
• \Misconduct serious enough to warrant an employee's dismissal is not necessarily serious enough to warrant the forfeiture of compensation benefits.\
• claimant engaged in telephone argument with branch manager during which she used profanity when referring to manager

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).