Benguiat v. Blackaller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, consistent with the broad protection for drinking water before it comes out of the tap, a defective plumbing fixture was a “source of drinking water.”
• courts avoid constructions that would make “a particular item in a series ... markedly dissimilar to other items on the same list”
• courts avoid constructions that would make “a particular item in a series . . . markedly dissimilar to other items on the same list”
• “civil statutes for the protection of the public are, generally, broadly construed in favor of that protective purpose”
• courts avoid constructions that would make “a particular item in a series . . . markedly dissimilar to other items on the same list”
• courts avoid constructions that would make “a particular item in a series . . . markedly dissimilar to other items on the same list”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).