Benet v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the argument that a person could not commit sodomy without also committing the offense of sexual abuse ignored that touching the victim's genitals through his clothes \is an entirely separate act and offense than his orally sodomizing the victim[ ]\
• compliance with the notification provisions of KRS 418.075 is mandatory even in criminal cases
• compliance with the notification provisions of KRS 418.075 is mandatory even in criminal cases
• “[A] defendant automatically becomes a violent offender at the time of his or her conviction of an offense specifically enumerated in KRS 439.3401(1)(a) regardless of whether the final judgment of conviction contains any such designation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).