Benenfeld v. Benenfeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a husband cannot be required to pay a support award that exceeds his financial ability
• alimony award was excessive where alimony award and insurance deductible together constituted nearly 80% of the husband's net income
• alimony award was excessive where alimony award and insurance deductible together constituted nearly 80% of the husband’s net income
• alimony award was excessive where alimony award and insurance deductible together constituted nearly 80% of the husband's net income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ballesteros v. Ballesteros
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-19· cited 9×
• Yeakle v. Yeakle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-24· cited 8×
• Miller v. Miller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-25· cited 5×
• Posner v. Posner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-30· cited 5×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ginsburg v. Ginsburg
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-12-16· cited 5×
• Law Offices of Sharon P. Talbot, P.A. v. Savoie
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-25· cited 1×