Skip to main content

Benelhocine v. State

Citations

  • 717 So. 2d 104
  • 1998 WL 484052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, having entered his plea, admitting probation violation, without reserving right to appeal any dispositive issue, and without filing motion to withdraw plea before lower tribunal, defendant did not preserve issues related to validity of plea for appellate review
  • dismissing appeal which raised issue of \coerced plea\ without prejudice to file motion pursuant to rule 3.850
  • dismissing appeal from revocation of probation where defendant admitted violations and failed to move for plea withdrawal
  • dismissing appeal due to defendant’s failure to preserve his right to appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases named Benelhocine v. State

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.