· 1/20/1931
Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees v. Bell
Citations
- 46 F.2d 225
- 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “choos[ing]” to use the term “authority,” although the board and the administra- tive law judge used the term “jurisdiction,” but refraining from the “attempt to definitively define either”
- “choos[ing]” to use the term “authority,” although the board and the administra- tive law judge used the term “jurisdiction,” but refraining from the “attempt to definitively define either”
- “choos[ing]” to use the term “authority,” although the board and the administra- tive law judge used the term “jurisdiction,” but refraining from the “attempt to definitively define either”
- “choos[ing]” to use the term “authority,” although the board and the administra- tive law judge used the term “jurisdiction,” but refraining from the “attempt to definitively define either”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.