Skip to main content
· 1/20/1931

Benefit Ass'n of Railway Employees v. Bell

Citations

  • 46 F.2d 225
  • 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 2392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “choos[ing]” to use the term “authority,” although the board and the administra- tive law judge used the term “jurisdiction,” but refraining from the “attempt to definitively define either”
  • “choos[ing]” to use the term “authority,” although the board and the administra- tive law judge used the term “jurisdiction,” but refraining from the “attempt to definitively define either”
  • “choos[ing]” to use the term “authority,” although the board and the administra- tive law judge used the term “jurisdiction,” but refraining from the “attempt to definitively define either”
  • “choos[ing]” to use the term “authority,” although the board and the administra- tive law judge used the term “jurisdiction,” but refraining from the “attempt to definitively define either”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.