· 4/15/1981
Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank v. Roselli (In Re Roselli)
Citations
- 10 B.R. 665
- 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 3918
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- debtors offered no evidence that keeping home was essential to plan; proof demonstrated that comparable housing was readily available and the home was unessential to debtor’s employment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Emil F. Goldhaber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.