Skip to main content
· 4/15/1981

Beneficial Mutual Savings Bank v. Roselli (In Re Roselli)

Citations

  • 10 B.R. 665
  • 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 3918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • debtors offered no evidence that keeping home was essential to plan; proof demonstrated that comparable housing was readily available and the home was unessential to debtor’s employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Emil F. Goldhaber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.