Benedict v. State Farm Bank, FSB

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s annoying calls to plaintiff did not amount to actionable intrusion where no surveillance, physical trespass, or physical touching was alleged
• a complaint must contain “enough detail to afford the defendant . . . a fair opportunity to frame a responsive pleading”
• dismissal of a claim under OCGA § 9-11-12 (b) (6) is appropriate where the allegations of the complaint “ ‘disclose with certainty’ that no set of facts consistent with the allegations could be proved that would entitle the plaintiff to the relief he seeks”
• dismissal of a claim under OCGA § 9-11-12 (b) (6) is appropriate where the allegations of the complaint “‘disclose with certainty’ that no set of facts consistent with the allegations could be proved that would entitle the plaintiff to the relief he seeks”
• dismissal of a claim under OCGA § 9-11-12 (b) (6) is appropriate where the allegations of the complaint “ ‘disclose with certainty’ that no set of facts consistent with the allegations could be proved that would entitle the plaintiff to the relief he seeks”
• affirming dismissal of invasion of privacy claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).