Skip to main content
· 4/17/1891

Benedict v. Farlow

Citations

  • 1 Ind. App. 160
  • 27 N.E. 307
  • 1891 Ind. App. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is a well-settled principle that parol evidence is not admissible to vary the terms or import of a writing....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Any, Been, Counsel, Reinhard, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.