· 8/28/1992
Benedick v. Mohr
Citations
- 600 N.E.2d 63
- 233 Ill. App. 3d 903
- 175 Ill. Dec. 440
- 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 1427
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affording preclusive effect to a restitution order for theft because it “goes to the merits and forms a substantive part of the matter that is being litigated in a hearing before the court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: William A. Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.