Bene v. Zoning Hearing Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the common pleas court’s remand to the Board to develop an adequate record because there was “no determination on the merits of the accessory use issue and insufficient evidence in the record for meaningful appellate review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).