Skip to main content
· 7/9/2013

Bender v. County of Los Angeles

Citations

  • 217 Cal. App. 4th 968
  • 159 Cal. Rptr. 3d 204
  • 2013 WL 3423258
  • 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the Bane Act applied 9 because an arrest without probable cause and with the use of excessive force involved 10 “coercion that is no way inherent in an arrest, either lawful or unlawful”
  • rejecting a broad interpretation of Shoy-oye that requires a plaintiff show “threats, intimidation, or coercion” independent from a violation of the federal constitution
  • “Where, as here, an arrest is unlawful and excessive force is applied in making the arrest, 2 there has been coercion independent from the coercion inherent in the wrongful detention itself— 3 a violation of the Bane Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grimes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.