Skip to main content
· 12/28/1889

Bendel v. Crystal Ice Co.

Citations

  • 82 Cal. 199
  • 22 P. 1112
  • 1889 Cal. LEXIS 834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Whether to reopen the evidence falls within the sound discretion of the trial court and the exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.” (punctuation omitted)
  • the testimony of one to whom a co-defendant spoke the day after crimes were committed regarding what the co-defendant told the witness about appellant’s participation in the crimes did not violate the appellant’s right to confront the witnesses against him
  • the testimony of one to whom a co-defendant spoke the day after the crimes were committed regarding what the co-defendant told the witness about appellant’s participation in the crimes did not violate the appellant’s right to confront the witnesses against him
  • the testimony of one to whom a co- defendant spoke the day after the crimes were committed regarding what the co- defendant told the witness about appellant’s participation in the crimes did not violate the appellant’s right to confront the witnesses against him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Works

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.