Benbow v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that State’s argument that arrest was legal under T.A. § 26-202 was “strained” considering that “Benbow’s identity was never in question”
• indicating that the “privilege to drive” is not automatic, but rather “dependent” on some form of legal entitlement, such as a valid out of state driver’s license

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Sullivan
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-03-09· cited 6×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-27· cited 4×
• United States v. Dunham
  D. Maryland· 2001-09-04

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• Chimel v. California
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
• Bottoson v. Florida
  Supreme Court· 1984-10-01· cited 793×
• Colvin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-16· cited 90×
• Gamble v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-21· cited 53×
• Stackhouse v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-23· cited 45×
• Ricks v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-03-05· cited 36×
• Howell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-04-02· cited 23×