· 9/1/1994
Benavidez v. Eu
Citations
- 34 F.3d 825
- 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6683
- 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1225
- 94 Daily Journal DAR 12360
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23796
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “Younger’s scope is closely circumscribed to parties actually involved in state litigation” and, therefore, Younger did not bar the suit of a plaintiff whose lawyer was involved as amicus in a state proceeding concerning similar claims
- “Younger abstention is not jurisdictional, but reflects a court’s prudential decision not to exercise jurisdiction which it in fact possesses.”
- guoting U.S. Steel Corp., 614 F.2d at 845
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.