Skip to main content
· 9/1/1994

Benavidez v. Eu

Citations

  • 34 F.3d 825
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6683
  • 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1225
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 12360
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23796

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “Younger’s scope is closely circumscribed to parties actually involved in state litigation” and, therefore, Younger did not bar the suit of a plaintiff whose lawyer was involved as amicus in a state proceeding concerning similar claims
  • “Younger abstention is not jurisdictional, but reflects a court’s prudential decision not to exercise jurisdiction which it in fact possesses.”
  • guoting U.S. Steel Corp., 614 F.2d at 845

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.