Benavidez, Alberto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an offense is a CIMT “if even the minimum conduct needed to violate the state statute would involve moral turpitude”
• noting that this Court does not have the authority to consider “bases for relief that were not raised below”
• noting that this Court does not have the authority to consider \bases for relief that were not raised below\
• directing the government to facilitate previously removed petitioner’s return to the United States pursuant to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement Policy Directive
• noting we may only review a removal order if the petitioner has exhausted his administrative remedies
• rejecting the government’s position that a petitioner cannot “cit[e] certain cases for the first time on appeal in order to elaborate on the breadth of” her argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).