Ben Sager Chemicals International, Inc. v. E. Targosz & Co., and Thorson Chemical Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff failed to elicit testimony from former counsel to support allegations that counsel was preoccupied with personal problems
• “[njeither ignorance nor carelessness on the part of a litigant or his attorney provide grounds for relief under Rule 60(b)(1)”
• \ 'Rule 60(b) provides for extraordinary relief and may be invoked only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances.' \
• relief from default judgment properly denied where default was based on counsel’s failure to comply with discovery
• ignorance or carelessness of client or attorney do not constitute grounds for reopening judgment under Rule 60(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P.
• “ ‘Rule 60(b) provides for extraordinary relief and may be invoked only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).