Ben Core and Polly Anna Core v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “that the district court did not err in denying the [plaintiff’s] motion to remand” filed “after the amount of damages sought was amended to under the” requisite “jurisdictional amount”
• affirming a district court’s denial of plaintiffs’ motion for remand despite plaintiffs’ post-removal amendment reducing damages sought below the amount 2 in controversy requirement
• per curiam opinion in part affirming district court’s denial of remand “after the amount of damages sought was amended to under the $10,000 jurisdictional amount,” but not stating the amount of damages pleaded in the original complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).