Bemort, Inc. v. Deerfield Beach Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an expert’s conclusions must be grounded upon salient record-based facts
• finding intent in Joint State Government Commission Comments to an Eminent Domain Code provision to “change existing law” in a way that abrogated prior precedent, and concluding that further reliance upon that precedent would be misplaced
• finding intent in Joint State Government Commission Comments to an Eminent Domain Code provision to “change existing law” in a way that abrogated prior precedent, and concluding that further reliance upon that precedent would be misplaced
• trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a 16 letter from a developer containing an offer to purchase the condemned property for $8 million because it “was helpful in demonstrating the demand for the property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).