Bemis Co., Inc. v. Hines

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff’s “Motion to Set Aside Decree and Restore the Cause to the Docket” was, in -4- substance, a motion for new trial
• holding that the plaintiff’s “Motion to Set Aside Decree and Restore the Cause to the Docket” was, in substance, a motion under Tenn. R. Civ. P. 59.02 for a new trial
• holding that the plaintiff‘s ―Motion to Set Aside Decree and Restore the Cause to the Docket‖ was, in substance, a motion under Tenn. R. Civ. P. 59.02 for a new trial
• treating a “Motion to Set Aside Decree and Restore the Cause to the Docket” as a motion for a new trial because it was “clearly ascertainable” from the body of the motion that the appellant sought a new trial
• courts must consider motions by their substance rather than their title

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).