Bembery v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had a right to sue the District of Columbia for breach of a lease agreement once plaintiff had submitted its bills for extra rent
• finding that appellant’s making “successive demands and receiving] no payment from the [appellee]” was sufficient for claim to accrue; explicit refusal to pay by appellee was not necessary
• rejecting plaintiffs argument that the claim for breach of contract did not accrue until it received a letter from the District of Columbia stating that it did not intend to pay the bills for extra rent
• (1) the existence of a contract; a breach; and damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).