Bem v. Bem

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• significant connections and substantial evidence is sufficient for jurisdiction despite home state jurisdiction elsewhere
• significant connections and substantial evidence is sufficient for jurisdiction despite home state jurisdiction elsewhere
• significant connections and substantial evidence is sufficient for jurisdiction despite home state jurisdiction elsewhere

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barndt v. Barndt
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-30· cited 37×
• Scheafnocker v. Scheafnocker
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-22· cited 8×
• Van Norman v. Upperman
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-03-17· cited 5×
• Boudwin v. Boudwin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-11-06· cited 5×
• Carney v. Dahlmann
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-04-26· cited 4×
• Adams v. Adams
  Lebanon County Court of Common Pleas· 1985-01-02
• Brinker v. Brinker
  Mercer County Court of Common Pleas· 1985-01-04

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hattoum v. Hattoum
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-02-05· cited 42×
• Warman v. Warman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-08· cited 29×