Skip to main content
· 3/12/1991

Beltz v. Beltz

Citations

  • 466 N.W.2d 765
  • 1991 Minn. App. LEXIS 235
  • 1991 WL 30302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • promissory note awarded in divorce settlement not considered as earnings in modification action
  • promissory note for $50,000 split 60/40 between husband and wife; husband’s portion of principal of note could not be considered in determining change for modification action but interest on note could be considered as increase in husband’s earnings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Klaphake, Nierengarten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.