Belozer v. Cooper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was not even “related to” jurisdiction over asbestos litigation between non-debtors, based upon possibility that some defendants might assert indemnity claim against debtors
• noting that Pacor “clearly remains good law in this circuit” in this respect
• noting that Pacor “clearly remains good law in this circuit” in this respect
• noting that Pacor “clearly remains good law in this circuit” in this respect
• “[W]hether a lawsuit could ‘conceivably’ have an effect on the bankruptcy proceeding inquires whether the allegedly related lawsuit would affect the bankruptcy without the intervention of yet another lawsuit.”
• “related to” subject matter jurisdiction exists only if “the allegedly related lawsuit would affect the bankruptcy proceeding without the intervention of another — even a third-party — lawsuit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).