Skip to main content
· 3/7/1925

Beloit Building Co. v. Staley

Citations

  • 118 Kan. 141
  • 234 P. 57
  • 1925 Kan. LEXIS 131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant should have been permitted to claim self-defense as a justification for the nonassaultive crime of carrying a concealed weapon
  • holding that when a defendant is not alleged to possess any of the weapons “specifically identified in the statute,” the prosecution must prove that the instrument carried by the defendant was an “other dangerous weapon”
  • the defendant should have been permitted to claim self-defense in response to the nonassaultive crime of carrying a concealed weapon
  • the defendant should have been permitted to claim self-defense in response to the nonassaultive crime of carrying a concealed weapon
  • the defendant should have been permitted to claim self-defense in response to the nonassaultive crime of carrying a concealed weapon

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harvey, Hopkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.