Skip to main content
· 7/5/1920

Beloate v. Beloate

Citations

  • 145 Ark. 73
  • 223 S.W. 361
  • 1920 Ark. LEXIS 364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concerning communications to third-party mail vendor not encompassed within statute’s exemptions
  • “A ‘bare statutory violation’ is not enough, no matter how beneficial we may think the statute to be.”
  • “Because [Plaintiff] has alleged only a legal infraction— a ‘bare procedural violation’—and not a concrete harm, we lack jurisdiction to consider his claim.”
  • “Again -- no standing when the plaintiffs alleged a statutory violation that did not hurt them.”
  • “[A]t the motion-to-dismiss stage, a plaintiff must allege facts that, taken as true, ‘plausibly’ state that the elements of standing are met.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Humphreys

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.