· 7/5/1920
Beloate v. Beloate
Citations
- 145 Ark. 73
- 223 S.W. 361
- 1920 Ark. LEXIS 364
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concerning communications to third-party mail vendor not encompassed within statute’s exemptions
- “A ‘bare statutory violation’ is not enough, no matter how beneficial we may think the statute to be.”
- “Because [Plaintiff] has alleged only a legal infraction— a ‘bare procedural violation’—and not a concrete harm, we lack jurisdiction to consider his claim.”
- “Again -- no standing when the plaintiffs alleged a statutory violation that did not hurt them.”
- “[A]t the motion-to-dismiss stage, a plaintiff must allege facts that, taken as true, ‘plausibly’ state that the elements of standing are met.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Humphreys
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.